Xfs vs btrfs vs ext4. #11. Xfs vs btrfs vs ext4

 
 #11Xfs vs btrfs vs ext4  2

Regarding filesystems. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. Use whatever your distro vendor supports: on Redhat and spinoffs, use XFS+LVM (the latter gives you snapshotting capabilities today;: XFS itself will receive them in the medium term), on Suse use BTRFS. If you don't need consistency supported by a filesystem, you can use ext4 with journal option off, F2FS (when a program that use /tmp. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. All of these Linux. Both. ext4 is certainly is much more stable than btrfs. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4. I would reccomend btrfs only if you need the extra features that ext4 doesn't provide like compression or snapshots. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. 7. Ext4 比 Btrfs 更穩定嗎? 儘管在撰寫本文時 Btrfs 缺乏穩定性和. For pure data storage, however, the btrfs is the winner over the ext4, but time still will tell. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. - chống phân mảnh dữ liệu nhanh chóng. If your think you don’t need btrfs style backups, or you run timeshift on ext4 then stick with it. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Ext4 is kind of the "tried and true" old file system that works and has good performance, but lacks many modern features, like snapshots, subvolumes, etc. The Ext4 filesystem does not support creating snapshots of the filesystem. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. Linux vs. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. In this test, Btrfs outperformed LVM in every benchmark. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. 但无论如何,各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息,因为这是内核规定的(见下)。. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. misleading. OMV4 or OMV5. Like I said, you could do ZFS, but definitely feels a bit like overkill. NTFS. ext4 if I don't care about the install. When use btrfs it's 35-40 MB/s. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. The ext file-system uses a system called inodes to track information about the files stored in the virtual directory. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. However, if you have a Shingled-write rotational drive do NOT use XFS it will grind to a halt. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. 2. 0 unterstützt. Btrfs vs Ext4. Btrfs is a big leap past ext4 and XFS because it supports features such as: Copy-on-write; Subvolumes, snapshots, and rollbacks; Online defragmentationEl tipo de archivo Btrfs admite un tamaño de partición de hasta 16 EIB (Exibyte). You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. One thing that seems to be true for BTRFS in all three articles… For whatever reason it seems to be much slower initially starting up stuff, eg during a boot and launching an application, but otherwise can perform well. 6. Does it means that Btrfs is better than Ext4 now ? btrfs has already long been an excellent and stable filesystem. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. So…. What would you recommend for this, XFS vs BTRFS, I'll be using it for a few VMs and other backup type storage. Ext3 and ext4 have some very specific differences, which I'll focus on here. - no encryption. Your gaming performance shouldn't be affected by either, since games are mostly just reads anyways. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. has built-in support for snapshots - useful for both backups and “testing out” scripts. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. F2FS vs. A) crater. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. The problem (which i understand is fairly common) is that performance of a single NVMe drive on zfs vs ext4 is atrocious. EXT4 vs. Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. ZFS. EXT4 vs. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. NTFS and FAT are known in Windows environments. BTRFS, ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 File Systems – Complete Comparison. AdamV158. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example:8. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. 3 with zfs-2. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. Mar 14, 2012. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. wbeater • 3 yr. It. Data integrity protection. This might lead one to move to btrfs on the SMR disk. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. Comparison of file archivers. 1. The checking task improved 14,6 %. This is useful, though far less complete than the block-by-block checksums of btrfs and ZFS. F2FS vs. Now today I had a power outage on our office server and I discovered that one file on the JFS volume has been completely corrupted. Picking a filesystem is not really relevant on a Desktop computer. I've also heard that LVM snapshots can. Unix, etc. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. - Hạn mức (quota) cho các thư mục chia sẻ - Nhân bản toàn bộ Share. Ext4 te permite crear un máximo de 232 archivos. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that. Bcachefs in its current state was benchmarked against EXT4/XFS/Btrfs/F2FS/ZFS with each file-system being tested with its default mount options and done using an Intel Optane 900p 280GB NVMe solid-state drive. A:EXT4是更高效高性能的系统,接下来依次是XFS,EXT3. EXT4 Vs XFS. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. Hardwareseitig gibt es bei Btrfs jedoch Ausnahmen. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of. ZFS is faster than ext4, and is a great filesystem candidate for boot partitions! I would go with ZFS, and not look back. Comparison of archive formats. NVMe drives formatted to 4096k. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. Linux 5. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. Very much depends if you want to go JBOD style or have a RAID-type-style though. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. 0 X. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. For a single disk, both are good options. Thanks. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. The only issue with it is that its built-in RAID 5/6 functionality is still not usable and can lead to data loss. Otherwise btrfs for snapshots via snapper. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. Es un sistema de archivos actualizado y también fiable. Ext4 is more mature, whereas Btrfs has features that should allow for greater resilience (and, in theory, should make it less susceptible to data corruption). ZFS combines a filesystem and volume manager. See moreA number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. I think the consensus these days is it’s good for single drive and raid 1. Reasons why I avoided btrfs:Increased Performance of ext4 vs. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. ext4 vs NTFS. When space gets low, Btrfs automatically expands the volume in chunks of roughly 1 GB. 2. 3 which makes XFS v5 the default and all the benefits it brings. Offizieller Beitrag. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. XFS vs. After deciding to use LVM2 as volumemanager on our servers there was also the wish for an online resizeable filesystem. The maximum partition size of a btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, and the maximum file size is also 16 exbibytes. xx kernel days was an entirely different story, however. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. 29 release of the Linux kernel. bit of time making sure XFS is “up to snuff”. I know the latest versions do not setup /home in a separate partition anymore but as a btrfs subvolume instead. Last updated on Aug 4, 2023 All File Systems How do you compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS? Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community File systems are an essential. On the other hand, if you need low latency random appends, this benchmark suggests you want xfs, especially on SMR. If you think that you need the advanced features. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. Otherwise it's sort of figuring out what features you want to drop. Copy. Btrfs vs ext4 . El ext4 y xf. B:EXT3性能最好,如果软件大量的随机寻址的话这个文件系统性能更好. So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. 14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 20 January 2018. The ZFS file system combines a volume manager and file. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. Next lets modify our fstab to match something like this ( remember to change the file-system from ext4 to btrfs in the next column) nano /etc/fstab. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. Hello everyone, I can't choose proper filesystem between XFS, ZFS (OpenZFS), BTRFS, F2FS and EXT4. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. ext4 is not recommended. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. btrfs is da bomb yo. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. This file system enables drive pooling, automatic snapshot, transparent compression, and online defragmentation. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. 4. Even after then I was able to transfer data out of the filesystem. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. With the noatime option, the access timestamps on the filesystem are not updated. 00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1. Using multiple drives of varying sizes created a luks1 encrypted ‘single’ data and dup meta volume. These included Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem (EXT4). Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. I think ext4 is _much_ faster at fsck. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. 3. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. 3. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. So, Btrfs has built-in RAID support and therefore this feature is inherent in it. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Built By the Slant team. Both file systems can recover from a power loss, but using Btrfs will not immunize you from them. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. 其實你提到一個重點了. Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. User quotas for each shared folder. Used with LVM; ext4 is complimented with things like Extending volumes. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is presented as a default file system, as well as it is faster than the btrfs when transferring files. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. It's not "better" because better depends on your use case. buying used laptops with older ssd vs a new one. xfs/. I don’t think any vendor will support ZFS unless Oracle fixes the license. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Hey guys, I’m also in this quest of finding out the best configs for the temp drives. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 BTRFS is the latest file system we present, and began development in 2007 by Oracle Corporation as a replacement for EXT4. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. at least as much as ext4 (which isn’t all that trusted by SUSE). Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. $ sudo su - # fsck. , power failure) could be acceptable. If you think that you need. BTRFS is good for rotational drives too, but it's still not fully mature and I'm hesitant to recommend it because of previous issues with data. The XFS File System. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. I’d have to say that depends a lot on your perspective as to ‘age’. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. I've done it by creating both a btrfs & xfs volume that doesn't appear to have any issues, currently using the btrfs one. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. which btw you should put in here then as well. NT-based Windows did not have any support for FAT32 up to. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. g. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. With 4K random reads by FIO, the SATA/USB performance was flat across the. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. The way you describe this workload, I think it is not very demanding. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. 1 Like. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. To recommend a suitable file system, I need to know the exact purpose of /tmp. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. Depends on the application. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. • 2 yr. ^ Microsoft first introduced FAT32 in MS-DOS 7. Guys, the main reason why I want to use btrfs is way better speed in/at/on 4k block size. EXT4 vs. Btrfs is always faster than ext4 when used with the nodatacow mount option. Advantages of Btrfs over Ext4. El tipo de archivo Ext4 admite tamaños de partición de hasta 1 EiB (Exibyte). ZFS is great but heavy/complex, and lack of block pointer rewrite can be painful. But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. Ext4 se basa en una tecnología más antigua, por lo que carece de las características modernas del sistema de archivos que se encuentran en sistemas como E2FS y BtrFS. Ahh…zfs is older than both ext4 and btrfs being released in 2006. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. SSD Optimization. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: 8. XFS and ext4 are probably where I'd look for a single disk hard drive. But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. Also consider XFS, which works better for extremely large files. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. windows and linux use one big D: for data storage, NTFS C: and EXT4 Linux are only for OS and software. Snapshots. Features of the XFS and ZFS. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. Also, server raid originally md raid5 (4x4TB NAS drives) with XFS had taken all day to build, but creating btrfs-raid10 was seconds. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. EXT4. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. Compared to classic RAID1, modern FS have two other advantages: - RAID1 is whole device. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. While options like XFS and ZFS aren’t nearly as famous, there are certain cases where you should consider making them the file system of choice. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. @Falzo said: I think in general the comparison is a bit. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. Puedes crear hasta 264 archivos en un sistema Btrfs. In practice, I don't consider the Btrfs slowdown really relevant for desktop usage on an SSD, VM performance aside. Seriously, fuck them. 38. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. Recommended for general use. Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. ”. . That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. 3. This time around, ext4 has managed. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. Running this fio command, I get about 2. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. g. 1. Ability to shrink filesystem. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems,. Yeah I think EXT4 and BTRFS are the way to go for everyone, unless you have specific other needs. For more than 3 disks, or a spinning disk with ssd, zfs starts to look very interesting. Diferenças básicas entre o Ext4 e o Btrfs. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. Since btrfs does not work like a normal partition, but uses volumes and subvolumes per default on fedora, you may see other challenges. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. 0. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. Notes[ edit] ^ IBM introduced JFS with the initial release of AIX OS/2 Warp. The SATA 3. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. Btrfs is one of the most popular newly created file systems, and was. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, ext4. That being said, it is meant as a temporary solution to migrate data to a native Unix file system, such as ZFS or UFS. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. ZFS isn't native to Linux, nor is it GPL compatible, but it works fairly well and is a stable file system. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. XFS vs. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. BtrFS is still very experimental and is not recommended for a production server or desktop environment. but rather comparable to the usage of md-raid underneath or LVM. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. Linux 5. ZFS (defaults): natty: 171. XFS is more and more mature than Btrfs, but. Not a ton of bells and whistles, but they Just Work. This correlates with the previous experiment and the hypothesis. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. g. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. It has been tried and tested, it is no doubt a solid and stable filesystem. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. . First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. ago. - Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. XFS与Ext4性能比较. BTRFS improves file addressing capacity to 16 EiB and volume sizes up to 16 EiB, just like ZFS. The question is XFS vs EXT4. For SSDs, F2FS really is a hands down winner still, although EXT4 and XFS are catching up, they still lose. But still iffy on high raid levels. The Btrfs filesystem supports read-only and writable snapshots of the file. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. So können kleinere. ext4,xfs,btrfs,zfsでベンチマークしてます。. Without going too technical, if you want to have easy system backups so that you can revert to if an update breaks the system, then btrfs. The Ext4 File System. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. In summary, both Btrfs and Ext4 are good options for your NAS, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on your specific needs and use case. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. 1.